Liberals and Conservatives…Step
on it; Slow Down!
A cranky opinion for
CRANKY OPINION SATURDAY
The following opinion is that of a
cranky old man with but a little knowledge on the topic opined. Opposing opinions are welcome. They are welcome but they will probably be
ignored. As always, please, no name
calling. That means you, you big stupid-head.
Politics,
like England in the song, “Swings like a pendulum do.” On the far edge of each
swing of the pendulum we have conservatives and liberals.
Liberals
want to improve everything; eliminate
hunger, end disease, save the environment, and make all things fair.
Conservatives
want to think about stuff; let’s not move too soon and ruin what we have. Sometimes a good idea has consequences. Sometimes easy obvious solutions are not such
good ideas.
During the
early days of computing at my job in a former life, we had the equivalent of
conservatives and liberals.
The computer
people were the liberals. They could do
fantastic things. They could develop systems
to improve work flow and reduce costs beyond anything previously thought
possible. The liberal computer people
constantly delivered and life in my user world of processing and operations
improved beyond imagination.
The liberal
computer people ruled. Management, the
conservatives, gave them full rein and everyone profited. The workers reveled in improved conditions;
management loved the cost control and process improvement. There were still projects for the liberals to improve.
There came a
time where the workers (that would include a young Cranky) would think of a
great idea and ask the liberal computer people if they could make it
happen. The computer people could make anything
happen. If you asked, they would deliver.
At some
point we reached a stage where the little guy users asked for things that
delivered little in the way of cost control or improved service. The computer people would deliver whatever
they were asked to deliver and development costs were never considered.
Simple
requests from the little guy users that had little or minimal value were implemented
at sometimes ridiculous development costs.
The result
was conservative management started to see expenses go through the roof with
little apparent value.
Management
looked at these costs and said,
“Damn, this is ridiculous!”
Management
stepped in, and rules and regulations were developed which analyzed every
request and a cost analysis protocol was implemented. Very expensive development processes that
could not be supported by significantly increased value were eliminated and
balance was restored to our world of processing.
As computer
sophistication and capabilities improved, the protocol analysis sometimes
became silly.
I once
called a programmer and asked if it would be possible to create a process that
would allow me to research various statistics with different criteria and even
multiple criteria. In past years this
request would have taken months to implement, if it was even possible, and would have used a great deal
of resources.
The
programmer told me that my request was now an easy one. He could implement it in a matter of hours
and I could be testing it the next day.
It was immediately apparent that the cost of this request was almost
nil. The benefits would be a great deal
of cost savings and would provide a service that otherwise was not only
valuable but believed by many to be impossible.
“That’s great,” I said. “Do it!”
“Can’t.”
“Why not”
“You need to submit a written request
to your management and sell them on the benefits. If approved, they send a request to my management. My management will ask me to do a cost
analysis. They will take my report and
discuss it at their next development request meeting which will be in a month; if
approved it will need to be funded by your management and assigned by my
management. I will get the assignment
and before I can start I must submit a development plan complete with
milestones and benchmarks. That will
take a week and another week to be approved.
When all that is done, you can have your application for testing the
next day. After testing, implementation should
only take another month or two.”
“But testing will take only minutes. If it works it works, if it doesn’t it is all
back end, it cannot effect any critical processes.”
“I’m sure you could explain that to your
management, might only take a month or so.”
The
programmer was a consultant. He was a
very bright dude from Pakistan. He was loath to skip
protocol, risk his job and have to go back to Pakistan.
“Damn, this is ridiculous!”
A year and a
half later my request was implemented. Conservative
Management was lauded for the increased efficiency; the Liberal Programmers
were praised for their ability.
And so the
pendulum swings in all things political, from the “We can do anything and all things new are good” liberals, to the “Now wait a second, let’s think about this,
stuff is already pretty good” conservatives. Both extremes of the pendulum are ridiculous. Common sense is in the middle, but common
sense is not arrived at easily.
Eventually
we get there, but common sense does take time.
The preceding was the opinion of a
cranky old man and not necessarily that of management…Mrs. Cranky.
Not to mention the ulcers that come with it all!
ReplyDeleteBrilliant! I'm guessing this demonstrates why start-up companies are often so successful: the bureaucracy is small and the enthusiasm is boundless. Then it's own success causes it to bog down, with the liberals and conservatives mucking things up. We need a Common Sense Party!
ReplyDeleteThere is no doubt that the best form of government would be a benevolent monarchy. Someone like Old King Cole (a merry old soul) would be perfect for America. The only problem is Liberals and Conservatives would have to form a committee to determine whether his appointment to the throne constitutes age discrimination against millennials.
ReplyDeleteoh, you brought back a lot of memories from my working life. my company spent 12 million developing an inhouse software program that ended up delivering exactly nothing...except a huge write-off. :)
ReplyDeleteThat's exactly the way it was. Still is, where the shop is run by committee.
ReplyDeleteAnd then it depends on who's on the committee. What agenda do they have or who do they really represent. It's a slippery slope and then some.
ReplyDeleteHave a fabulous day Cranky. ☺
I think this same mess is present in the public school system. Too top heavy with administrators making work for themselves. I'd like to say just leave the teachers alone to manage themselves; they have the best judgement. But then there's that teacher who put kids in the trunk of her car to go out for snacks.......yikes.
ReplyDeleteI've heard it said and I've had difficulty disproving it: Nothing serious was ever accomplished my a committee. I can't think of any great art or scientific achievements created by committees. My experience has been that forming committees is what people in power do to halt progress.
ReplyDeletePoint well taken, I guess I was trying to equate "committee" with voters in a democracy where it takes time but eventually I think we get it right, and that it sometimes takes the middle of the roaders to make sense of the idealist and the cautious extremes.
DeleteThe trouble is the pendulum defies gravity and will not maintain a healthy middle ground. It is a body in motion that persists, thanks to the incessant tugging from each side and just keeps up the never ending swing.
ReplyDeleteIn my educated judgement, committees and meetings are the two things that are usually meaningless, unnecessary and an all around pain in the ass. Except, of course, to the suits who have nothing better to do.
ReplyDeleteOK, first Stephen and now you, point taken. I am amending the post to remove mention of committee.
DeleteWell at least it did get implemented, albeit not immediately, but at least they listened to your suggestion and moved it along eventually.
ReplyDeletebetty
That swinging pendulum is making me very, very sleepy.
ReplyDelete