CLIMATE CHANGE
A cranky opinion for
CRANKY OPINION SATURDAY
The following is the opinion of an
ignorant narrow-minded cranky old man with absolutely no expertise on the topic
opined. Opposing opinions are expected
and will be ignored as I have no patience for anyone who disagrees with my
backward thinking ass. Still, please, no
name calling…it is just not becoming or productive…and that means you, you big
stupid-head!
I was not
going to offer a cranky opinion this Saturday.
I had nothing. Then I read
something about Climate Change and Climate Change Deniers. Now I have an opinion. Most of you can stop reading right now. Just write me off as a Neanderthal, ignorant,
non-thinking conservative jerk-weed and move on.
First off, I
am not a Climate Change Denier, I am skeptical of many aspects of the Global
Warming Debate. Yes I am going to call
it Global Warming, that way every time there is a tornado, a rain storm or a
blizzard that causes any destruction around the world we do not blame it on “Climate
Change.” The oldest written histories of the world all mention floods, storms,
droughts, and other disasters, I’m pretty sure they came before the combustion
engine.
Does Global Warming
exist? By a great majority, most scientists say “yes.” Some say “I’m not sure.” A small minority say “No.” Few of these scientists are experts in this particular
science. They are nothing more than
really smart people called scientists.
Climatologists are the real experts.
Do our best and brightest scientists become Climatologists, or do they
become doctors or chemists or physicists?
When we listen to Climatologists, are we listening to the equivalent of podiatrists* of the doctor world?
The Global
Warming Theory does make sense, even to a backward Neanderthal jerk like
myself. I know empirically that when
stuff is burned, stuff around the combustion gets warmer. We burn a lot of stuff in this world; probably
it will make the climate warmer.
I know that
when I am in a forest, it seems cooler than when I am in an open area. My guess is the trees offer shade and provide
cooling moisture and oxygen. We cut down
a lot of trees; it cannot help but make the planet warmer.
Makes sense,
the planet is probably getting warmer.
Am I skeptical about the statistics?
Why yes I am. Who collects the
data, where did it come from one hundred years ago; before computers, telecommunications,
accurate instruments and people that even gave a shit?
OK, global
warming probably exists to some degree and if not a direct cataclysmic threat, it will certainly
change our environment, I don’t like that idea, but it is not a new concept to
this planet. The climate seems to change
a lot even without our influence.
What should
we do about it? Stop burning stuff? Oil, coal? Where do we get power, because
we are NOT going to give up power,
and even if we do other countries will not.
How about
power from wind? Fine with me, but lots of
rich people don’t like how it ruins their view, plus some people don’t like how
birds, particularly endangered raptors tend to fly into those giant propeller things
and get chopped in half.
OK then,
Solar Power, that is fine with me as well.
But then there is that bird thing again.
Giant solar farms seem to be generating so much heat that they incinerate
birds that fly overhead.
You know what; screw the birds, screw the view, and do whatever it takes
in this country to stop burning stuff.
Let’s have our cars get 100 MPG, run stuff with electric or atomic power
(scientists tell us nuclear power is completely safe and we believe all scientists,
except maybe those from Chernobyl or Three Mile Island) let’s have a carbon tax
(That should be easy to enforce and not too subject to fraud), let’s do everything the
scientists and politicians who know what is best for us tell us to do.
Hear that… “Plop!”
That is the drop of water that just fell into a giant bucket of water.
I am not a
denier! I am a skeptic. I am skeptical of
an issue of science that has become primarily a political issue. It is an issue that is used to scare us into
decisions that may not be practical or in our best interests; a political
position that offers no solution, only pompous posturing in order to win
elections and fill the pockets of special interests.
If burning
stuff is reducing oxygen and polluting us with warming carbon dioxide, then let’s
fix the problem. Conservation is not
going to do more than postpone the coming destruction of the planet the experts
claim is on its way.
Band-aid
solutions are a joke.
Let’s really
put the scientists to work. Let’s put
our energy and capitol into develop technologies that take the carbon dioxide
out of the atmosphere and make oxygen and water out of it. Let our smart people invent stuff to solve
the problem. Hell, can’t we invent a process
to do what a tree does? Can only God
create photosynthesis? Many scientists don’t believe in God. They believe that science can create
anything that some people think comes only from God. Go ahead then, solve the problem intellectually, use science to solve the problem.
I think that
if there is a Global Warming problem it can be solved by new scientific
advances.
If you
disagree, are you a skeptic of our ability to have scientific advances, or are
you a Scientific Advance Denier?
Now excuse
me while I drag my stupid, un-thinking, conservative, cranky old ass back into
my cave before you all beat me up.
The preceding is the opinion of a
cranky old man and not necessarily that of management…Mrs. Cranky.
*Calm down foot people, but please, who goes to med school and chooses as his first choice Podiatrist?
*Calm down foot people, but please, who goes to med school and chooses as his first choice Podiatrist?