Monday, January 21, 2013
IS THAT A FACT? - A Cranky re-run
Monday is now officially Cranky re-run day. This re-run is from January 2012. I liked it, but it recieved only one comment and few hits. Why then am I re-running it? It's my blog and I liked it so here it is again.
IS THAT A FACT?
What is a fact? A fact is an assertion or statement that has yet to be disproved. Experts love to use facts to motivate people to accepting their ideas. People accept their “facts” and so they become…er…ah fact!
Here is a good one:
The Environmental Working Group’s (EWG) recently published Meat Eater’s Guide points out that if you ate once less burger a week it would be the environmentally-positive equivalent of taking your car off the road for 320 miles.
It must be true because a “working group” said it; but being a cranky old man I have to ask…Wha…Wha…Wha…WHAT?
I guess since hamburgers come from cattle, and cattle eat grass, and grass converts CO2 into Oxygen, and cattle fart methane, then eating hamburgers requires environmental-negative cattle. Still, I question this “fact”.
Did these experts really find a way to equate one hamburger a week into a number of cattle that if removed from the environment would reduce environmental destruction by virtue of less methane and more oxygen the equivalent of driving a car 320 miles?
RT- Am I the only one that misspells a word so badly that Microsoft Word offers no suggestions?
Is that car a Prius or a Lexus? What size burger? Is it a .99 Mickey Dee burger, or a big old ½ pounder? What am I eating instead of the burger? If I eat broccoli, wouldn’t that reduce oxygen replacing plants? Trust me, it would certainly increase methane!
Do I really have to feel guilty about destroying the environment because I eat a freaking hamburger?
Did you know that if we were to remove one Environmental Working Group Member from the earth it would be the environmentally -positive equivalent of growing one half acre of alfalfa?
That’s a fact!