NEW AND IMPROVED

This blog is now sugar FREE, fat FREE, gluten FREE, all ORGANIC and all NATURAL!!

Saturday, June 28, 2014

SEND OUR MARINE HOME


SEND OUR MARINE HOME
It is once again time for
Cranky Opinion Saturday

The following is the opinion of a cranky old man with absolutely no knowledge about the subject opined.  Opposing views are welcome.  They are welcome but will be ignored; and please, no name calling.  That means you, you big stupid head!

There has been a lot of discussion the last several weeks about the release of five senior Taliban leaders to secure the release of Army Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. 

Did the swap endanger future US soldiers or civilians as the Taliban look for more deals? 

Was five high profile enemy combatants giving up too much for a soldier?  That’s a tough one; it’s not too much if it’s my loved one. 

Was Bowe Bergdahl AWOL? Was he a traitor?

Evidence so far would indicate that at a minimum Sgt. Bergdahl was unstable.   That leads one to wonder was he unstable before he joined the Army and shouldn’t tests have shown that?  Was he unstable after shipping out to Afghanistan and should that have been detected and acted on?  I’m not sure any of these questions are able to be answered at this time. 

One objection I do have with this whole situation is Sgt. Bergdahl’s father meeting with President Obama at the White House. 

Why did he show up in a full Taliban type beard?  Yes, he is entitled to wear a full beard.  Hell, my son has a full beard.  I just wonder, what was he thinking.  As a simple public relations concern, I would have shaved that beard off.  The President of the United States just put his neck out to return his son; I think out of respect he would have realized that the full beard in this instance sent out a bad message, and was just a dumb idea .
"Dude...seriously?"
 

But enough of the Bergdahl issue, what really burns my buns is the Marine who made a wrong turn into Mexico with legally registered (in the US) guns, and the Mexican authorities would not let him turn around.  He has been in jail for several months and accounts say he has not been treated well.

Why can’t we bring him back?  Maybe the Administration is working diplomatically behind the scenes on his release …I hope so, but I do wonder. 

Why doesn’t the President send a message to the President of Mexico?  Why doesn’t he ask as a personal favor and for the good of friendly relations between our neighboring countries that Mexico release Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi?

President Obama might gently suggest that failure to release Sgt. Andrew Tahmooressi would make him very unhappy.  It might negatively influence how we deal with the issue of illegal Mexican immigration to the US.  Maybe he would be forced to send illegal immigrants back to Mexico in numbers that the Mexican economy might find difficult to absorb.  Maybe he might suggest that he could take several actions which would make tourism from the US to Mexico very unappealing.  Maybe he also just might suggest that if our Marine is not released he might just send in troops, planes, tanks and special service operatives and kick some Mexican ass!

Why are we so easily pushed around?  Andrew Tahmooressi risked his life, sacrificed several of his best years fighting in Afghanistan for his country, how about we fight for him.  How about we send a message that says, “We asked you nicely, now God Dammit give us our Marine back or we are going to get pissed off and you Mr. President of Mexico will be very sorry.”

No need to publicize any threats, but these possibilities should be addressed diplomatically.  Does Mexico really have anything to gain by holding our Marine other than to strut their stuff and thumb their nose at the USA?  Is that worth facing economic sanctions or ultimately military force? 

I hope we are reaching out diplomatically and requesting Mexico to release our Marine as a gesture of good will and in return we will offer genuine thanks. 

Don’t release him soon, and we should kick their ass. 

The preceding was the opinion of a cranky old man and not necessarily that of management…Mrs. Cranky.

11 comments:

  1. I agree with you that there must be some way to leverage the release of this soldier. Mexico needs us way more than we need them. Unfortunately, the Mexican government is corrupt in ways Americans will never understand and hopefully will never tolerate.

    ReplyDelete
  2. SH is correct. It will require the same illogical maneuvering to release Tahmooressi as it took to get Bergdahl. Probably is requiring it in the present tense. As for Bergdahl, he never should have been recruited, let alone made a Marine. As for his father--well, the apple fell right by the tree.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have trouble figuring out what this administration is doing most of the time. We have no foreign policy to speak of. It makes my head spin.

    Have a fabulous day. :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Why did he show up in a full Taliban type beard?

    And all this time I thought it was a Duck Dynasty beard!

    ReplyDelete
  5. I have no opinion on the situation. However, when it comes to having a crush on any or all of the previously mentioned young ladies of TV lore?
    Yup. Pretty much all of them.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm sure there's a hidden agenda of which we are unaware.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Very easy to answer why The President doesn't try to secure the release of the fellow in Mexico: Guns. Sure they're legal, but he sure as hell doesn't want them to be (or, at least, he makes hay from kowtowing to the left and they generally are against private gun ownership.) Horrible President.

    ReplyDelete
  8. "Why are we so easily pushed around?"
    Because governments everywhere are afraid to upset those rabid fanatics, so they get away with their mistreatment and murders etc, which then gives them more power, so "we" bend over even further backwards in case they come to our towns with their lunacies, and so it goes on.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This should be a no-brainer....we'll have another prisoner swap. We'll send them a couple hundred thousand Mexicans for our Marine.

    ReplyDelete
  10. He had legal guns. And at the moment it is not politically expedient. If neither of those were true he'd have been home same-day. The moment it can sway a cause or an election he'll be freed. Just watch .....

    ReplyDelete

I love comments, especially some of my commenters are funny as heck!

Oh, and don't be shy, Never miss a Cranky Post.

Sign up for an email of every post...over there...on your right...go on!