Do You Believe
Everything You Read?
His point
was that we should not be ruled by the ideas of people who knew nothing of our
country as it exists today. For
instance, the rule that our President must be born in this country was probably
more meaningful and important in 1783 than it is today. What does it matter, for instance, if Barack
Obama was not born in this country? If
it did matter, then people would use that as a basis to not vote for him.
The comments
that followed this article were full of venom and hatred for this
intellectual. I doubt that many of this
person’s persecutors even read the entire article. The title “Let’s Give up the Constitution”
was all they needed to go all “Fox News” on him.
Much of this
man’s argument for getting rid of The Constitution was really more in a “Let’s
rewrite those sections which make no sense in today’s world” vein. I don’t agree with the assertion that we should
junk The Constitution. We do have the
ability to amend the document plus judicial interpretations often effectively
make the document more in keeping with today’s world. I’m not sure the professor really wants to
junk The Constitution either. I think he
was being provocative to make a point.
I almost
commented on this article myself, with the intent to stick up for the author
and point out that he might not really be a America hating intellectual Liberal
piece of crap, but if you read the piece with an open mind, he had an
interesting point of view. I thought
better of commenting to people with such closed minds.
Politically
I am generally a Conservative (some would say just right of Ghengis Kahn) and certainly do not want to scrap The
Constitution. However in reading the
comments to this article I was reminded of one of my favorite retorts:
Years ago at
a weekly meeting my old boss held with his underlings, he mentioned an article
he had read which suggested a unique way to manage people (I don’t remember the
specifics.) He wasn’t telling his
managers to follow this advice; he merely thought it an interesting
perspective.
One person
at the meeting disagreed with the ideas the article raised. He challenged my boss, “Let me ask you…do you
believe everything you read?”
My boss paused and then
responded, “No…but I THINK about
everything I read.”
Too often
people today make the same mistake.
Thoughts and ideas are immediately accepted or lambasted and discarded
based on the perceived political bent of the author.
The world
would be a better place if everyone would not either believe or deride
everything that we read, but if we would at least THINK about what we read.