This blog is now sugar FREE, fat FREE, gluten FREE, all ORGANIC and all NATURAL!!

Thursday, November 8, 2012

PROGRESS - another Cranky re-run


Without power again thanks to a new nor’easter and six inches of snow, this oldie (November 2011) is sent from the Lowes parking lot in East Brunswick N. J.


There is always a price to pay for progress.

“You can have a telephone, but you lose your privacy and the charm of distance. You can conquer the skies, but the birds will lose their wonder and the clouds will smell of gasoline” (Spencer Tracy in “Inherit the Wind”).

I just read where the Obama administration has halted the construction of an oil pipeline from Canada through the States to the Gulf of Mexico.  There are concerns of oil spills ruining an aquifer in Nebraska and environmentalists are leery of the country becoming reliant on oil sands petroleum which does not burn as cleanly as other oils.

I am sure the issue is complicated, and we should not rush into projects if they could prove to be dangerous.  I do wonder however, if these concerns are really real or are they a knee jerk reaction against anything oil? 

We can’t drill off-shore, spills could be devastating.  We can’t drill in Alaska, leaks could be devastating.  We can’t pipe oil through the States, leaks could be devastating.  We can, apparently, use oil from other countries who are not concerned with devastating oil leaks.  This is fortunate for us.  If they cared about oil spills and leaks, we would be keeping warm by rubbing two sticks together and we would be walking a whole lot.

I wonder what the environmental consequences of other projects similar to this pipeline might be. 

Could we safely build a railroad line across the continent?  It seems to me that could be devastating to the deer, antelope, coyotes and bison.

It would be great to be able to communicate all over the country by telegraph or even telephone, but that would require stringing lines all over the 50 states.  Just think of the consequences of that to life as we know it.  I guess we could wait for cellular technology to solve that communication problem, except I am not sure if those cell waves are safe.   We should probably hold off on that until it is studied further.  There is always the Pony Express, unless spreading horse shit all over concerns you.  Maybe we could communicate across the globe via a series of smoke signals.  Hmmm…pollution…climate change…I don’t think that would work either.

We could build roads to communicate and also transfer goods via cars and trucks.  Oh yeah, that would be as bad as the railroad and telephone wire idea.

There is always radio and TV.  Have those signals been studied yet.  Sound waves, TV waves….they sound very scary to me. 

We could send mail by boat.  We could go from NY to LA fairly quickly if we could just cut through Panama.  Hmmm…that sounds risky and who knows how many insects, plants or animals a project like that could destroy. 

I guess we could stay in touch with other parts of the country and the world by plane.  Of course that would require building large airports which would upset local ecologies and cause air and noise pollution.  Also where would we get the oil to power such planes? 

Maybe we could drill for it off-shore and in Alaska and then pipe it in.

I just don’t know the answer.

Are caves safe?      


  1. I am sending my comment by carrier pigeon...

  2. I have mixed feelings about this Canadian pipeline. I just don't believe this would creat the hundreds of thousands of jobs Conservatives claim it would, maybe a few thousand. And this oil would pass through the USA to the gulf where it would be shipped away to foreign markets? How does that help us? We take all the environmental risks for little of the profit? I'm not saying "no" to this deal but the administration is wise to want to delay this to negotiate a better deal.

  3. Sigh. I know this is meant to be bitterly funny, but it isn't funny at all to me..

    For one thing, how can you compare our
    gorgeous country, environment and ecosystems to the Middle East.

    "We can’t drill off-shore, spills could be devastating. We can’t drill in Alaska, leaks could be devastating. We can’t pipe oil through the States, leaks could be devastating. We can, apparently, use oil from other countries who are not concerned with devastating oil leaks."

    Speaking geographically and environmentally, what do those oil producing countries have at risk? In fact, what do they have beside oil? What could be tainted or destroyed by oil leaks......I think it is called endless, mostly unpopulated Sand.......

  4. "...could be devastating to the deer, antelope, coyotes and bison..."

    Not to mention the folks living there already