PROGRESS
Without power again
thanks to a new nor’easter and six inches of snow, this oldie (November 2011) is sent from the
Lowes parking lot in East Brunswick N. J.
There is
always a price to pay for progress.
“You can
have a telephone, but you lose your privacy and the charm of distance. You can
conquer the skies, but the birds will lose their wonder and the clouds will
smell of gasoline” (Spencer Tracy in “Inherit the Wind”).
I just read
where the Obama administration has halted the construction of an oil pipeline from
Canada through the States to the Gulf of Mexico. There are concerns of oil spills ruining an
aquifer in Nebraska and environmentalists are leery of the country becoming
reliant on oil sands petroleum which does not burn as cleanly as other oils.
I am sure
the issue is complicated, and we should not rush into projects if they could
prove to be dangerous. I do wonder
however, if these concerns are really real or are they a knee jerk reaction
against anything oil?
We can’t
drill off-shore, spills could be devastating.
We can’t drill in Alaska, leaks could be devastating. We can’t pipe oil through the States, leaks
could be devastating. We can,
apparently, use oil from other countries who are not concerned with devastating
oil leaks. This is fortunate for
us. If they cared about oil spills and
leaks, we would be keeping warm by rubbing two sticks together and we would be
walking a whole lot.
I wonder
what the environmental consequences of other projects similar to this pipeline
might be.
Could we
safely build a railroad line across the continent? It seems to me that could be devastating to
the deer, antelope, coyotes and bison.
It would be
great to be able to communicate all over the country by telegraph or even
telephone, but that would require stringing lines all over the 50 states. Just think of the consequences of that to
life as we know it. I guess we could
wait for cellular technology to solve that communication problem, except I am
not sure if those cell waves are safe.
We should probably hold off on that until it is studied further. There is always the Pony Express, unless
spreading horse shit all over concerns you.
Maybe we could communicate across the globe via a series of smoke
signals. Hmmm…pollution…climate change…I
don’t think that would work either.
We could
build roads to communicate and also transfer goods via cars and trucks. Oh yeah, that would be as bad as the railroad
and telephone wire idea.
There is
always radio and TV. Have those signals
been studied yet. Sound waves, TV
waves….they sound very scary to me.
We could
send mail by boat. We could go from NY
to LA fairly quickly if we could just cut through Panama. Hmmm…that sounds risky and who knows how many
insects, plants or animals a project like that could destroy.
I guess we
could stay in touch with other parts of the country and the world by
plane. Of course that would require
building large airports which would upset local ecologies and cause air and
noise pollution. Also where would we get
the oil to power such planes?
Maybe we
could drill for it off-shore and in Alaska and then pipe it in.
I just don’t
know the answer.
Are caves
safe?
I am sending my comment by carrier pigeon...
ReplyDeleteI have mixed feelings about this Canadian pipeline. I just don't believe this would creat the hundreds of thousands of jobs Conservatives claim it would, maybe a few thousand. And this oil would pass through the USA to the gulf where it would be shipped away to foreign markets? How does that help us? We take all the environmental risks for little of the profit? I'm not saying "no" to this deal but the administration is wise to want to delay this to negotiate a better deal.
ReplyDeleteSigh. I know this is meant to be bitterly funny, but it isn't funny at all to me..
ReplyDeleteFor one thing, how can you compare our
gorgeous country, environment and ecosystems to the Middle East.
"We can’t drill off-shore, spills could be devastating. We can’t drill in Alaska, leaks could be devastating. We can’t pipe oil through the States, leaks could be devastating. We can, apparently, use oil from other countries who are not concerned with devastating oil leaks."
Speaking geographically and environmentally, what do those oil producing countries have at risk? In fact, what do they have beside oil? What could be tainted or destroyed by oil leaks......I think it is called endless, mostly unpopulated Sand.......
"...could be devastating to the deer, antelope, coyotes and bison..."
ReplyDeleteNot to mention the folks living there already